The Supreme Court of India in
recent times has been in the news for all wrong reasons. The biggest blot on its
history came this year when, Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya, then Chief of the
Gujarat High Court alleged that he was not elevated to the Supreme Court onlybecause he objected to the elevation of Justice Altamas Kabir’s sister to the
Calcutta High Court.
While most media covered this supersession of Justice Bhattacharya, they failed
to take note of two other related incidents.
However these incidents were
reported by Manoj Mitta here before Justice Bhattacharya’s revelations. To
quote Mitta, “The first instance was in January 2009 when C T Ravi Kumar, a
close relative of the-then CJI, K G Balakrishnan, was appointed as a judge of
the Kerala High Court. This was followed by the appointment in September 2010
of Justice Shukla Kabir Sinha, sister of Justice Altamas Kabir, as a judge of
the Calcutta High Court.” Mitta adds that shortly after these two elevations,
the then CJ’s of these two High Courts; namely Justice H L Dattu from Kerala
High Court and Justice S S Nijjar from Calcutta High Court were elevated the
Supreme Court. Both the supersession of Justice Bhattacharya and elevation of
close relatives of two Supreme Court justices escaped the attention of the
persons concerned and these incidents were never investigated.
I recently came across a letter
(dated 5th May, 2013) allegedly written by Dr. M Furquan. The
contents of the letter deserve serious and immediate attention but this is
being only circulated among lawyers and judges secretly. There is not much
information available about Dr. Furquan or means to contact him. A Supreme
Court judgment mentions Dr. Furquan as the editor of a fortnightly Urdu newspaper
by name ‘Sach Bilkul Sach’.
What matters is not the
credibility of Dr. Furquan but the seriousness of the allegations raised by Dr.
Furquan and some of these allegations have already turned out to be true. Earlier
this year, when I first received the copy of this letter, I wanted to write
about it while I was working at Live Law; but a threat of contempt held me back
from publishing this. Later, pilot edition of Crime Magazine (English), run by
Kerala based journalist, T P Nandakumar carried a more detailed story on this
but it was hardly noticed. Nandakumar is often seen as a pulp journalist by the
mainstream media; but the truth remains that most of his exposes were picked up
later by the mainstream media itself. I would like to thank Nandakumar for providing
me a copy of some documents needed to run this story.
The letter alleges that Justice
Altamas Kabir is the most corrupt Chief Justice India has ever seen. It says
Justice Kabir has delivered judgments and passed orders in favour of various
people, after charging crores as bribe. Particularly the letter says, though it
was Justice G S Singhvi, who was hearing the 2G scam case; on a special mention
before the CJI Court, Justice Kabir allowed non appearance of certain persons
before the Special Court trying the 2G case. Similarly in the Sahara Case,
though Justice K S Radhakrishnan was hearing the case, on a special mention
before the CJI Court, Justice Kabir allowed more time to Sahara for payment of
money to SEBI. Later another petition was moved by Sahara before the CJI Court
and Senior Advocate M N Krishnamani objected to the CJI court hearing this. In
an unprecedented intervention, the Bar Chief said, “In keeping with the
traditions of the court, I request you not to modify an order passed by another
bench." You can read more on this here.
These facts need to be read along
with the observations made by the present CJI, P Sathasivam in the Jai PrakashAssociates Limited’s case. A bench headed by Justice Sathasivam refused to
extend order passed by the predecessor bench (comprising Justice Altamas Kabir),
which granted interim protection to Jai Prakash Associates Limited from paying
25 Crores. The Bench said, “We do not approve of the manner in which the
interim orders came to be passed. We do not sit on appeal over orders passed by
a coordinate bench. These orders should not have been passed”. This statement
by Justice Sathasivam seems to be a testimony for allegations raised by Dr.
Furquan.
The most important allegation is
with regard to the NEET judgment. A Supreme Court Bench headed by Justice
Altamas Kabir in this case held that Medical Council of India’s (MCI) and
Dental Council of India’s (DCI) notification for holding common entrance test
called National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) for MBBS, BDS andpost-graduate medical courses is ultra vires the Constitution. Justice Anil R
Dave delivered a dissenting opinion. Dr. Furquan’s letter dated 5th
March, 2013 indicated that the judgment will be in favour of the medical
colleges which challenged the introduction of NEET. The judgment has come out
on 18th July, 2013 and Dr. Furquan’s prediction has turned true. Interestingly, Prashant Bhushan in an
interview alleged that the NEET judgment was given to private medical colleges
well before it was given to Justice Anil R Dave.
There are many other allegations
against Justice Altamas Kabir, present CJI P Sathasivam and also ex CJI, K G
Balakrishnan. The letter is self explanatory and is available for download
below. Towards the end of the letter, Dr. Furquan requests the President to
investigate (by the CBI) into the allegations. Dr. Furquan says, “As stated
earlier CJI Mr. Altamas Kabir is the most corrupt Chief Justice that India has
ever seen. In view of the forgoing, your Excellency is requested to kindly get
a thorough investigation done by the CBI on the Chief Justice of India, CJI Mr.
Altamas Kabir and also about his entire family members for finding out as to
how much financial assets they have accumulated since he took over as the Chief
Justice of India, as the details of the immovable property/assets declared by
him and his wife on 1.4.2012 (copy of which is enclosed) in Supreme Court Website
is far below than the actual assets he and his family now own and also about
all other above stated issues to the Director, CBI for thorough enquiry.”
A copy of this letter was marked
to several eminent personalities including; Justice G S Singhvi, Prime
Minister, Opposition Leader, CBI Director, Justice V R Krishna Iyer, Arvind
Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan. However no action seems to be taken to
investigate into the matters mentioned in this letter.
Justice V R Krishna Iyer has
written a separate letter (dated 25th May, 2013) to the President of
India, requesting to investigate into the matters mentioned by Dr. Furquan in
his letter. The letter says, “I have received a letter from Dr. M. Furquan
which I am enclosing herewith which casts a spell of moral lapses on the
judiciary itself. You, as the President of India are the guardian of its
noblest values. May I entreat you on behalf of ‘We, the People of India’ the
moral core of the Constitution and the humanity and divinity of Bharat’s cultural
heritage. To take action as the sublime head of the Indian Republic against
judges who are suspect of moral deviance”. An email sent to Justice Iyer’s
office asking if he has been informed of any action taken on his letter, did
not receive any response. Justice Iyer’s letter is also available for download
below.
In order to restore the credibility of the institution, it is
essential to investigate Dr. Furquan’s letter, lest it spells the doom of Indian judiciary!
NB: For republishing rights, please take prior permission from Stripped Law. You can contact me on +91 9400060160 or raghulsudheesh@gmail.com.
Supreme Court image from here.