The CLAT Core
Committee 2012 in its first meeting at NLU Jodhpur held during October 1-2,
2011 had dropped the idea of establishment of a CLAT Secretariat. Earlier, this
issue was raised in the meeting of CLAT 2011 held on September 21, 2012; however,
no decision was reached regarding this.
The CLAT
Secretariat, once established, would receive the funds/application fee for
conducting CLAT. Under the current setup, the fund is channelled directly to
the university conducting CLAT. While the organizing University utilize the
funds it receives as application fee for conducting CLAT, the rest is to be retained
by the said university. If the establishment of the CLAT Secretariat is
approved, the Universities subsequently conducting CLAT would no longer be
financially benefitted from the conduct of CLAT.
In response to
the RTI application filed by me, asking for the minutes of the meetings of the
CLAT core committee, an exclusive copy of the minutes of the first Core
Committee meeting held on 1st-2nd October 2011 was
obtained by me. The document indicated a unanimous disapproval of the proposal.
Although no apparent reason for such a strong negative response has been
stated. The minutes clearly state that this “chapter be treated closed”,
although, the reason behind such a closure was not made clear. Given below is
the extract from the document:
“It was pointed out that in the meeting of CLAT 2011
held on 21.09.2011 at WBNUJS Kolkata; there was no decision with respect to
agreement of establishing CLAT secretariat. Members were of the view that the
said minutes needs no confirmation. The CLAT Core Committee discussed the idea
of establishment of CLAT Secretariat and unanimously disapproved. The chapter
be treated as closed.”
Besides this, the
response to the RTI application was a delayed one and was received a week past
the limitation period of thirty days. The application, as tracked on the India
Post website, was received by the NLU Jodhpur authorities on 30th
April 2012. While the document sent in response portrays the date of 31st
may 2012, which is still one day late, the postal tracking facility on the
India Post website reveals the sending date as 7th June 2012, about
a week later than the deadline of 30th May 2012, in accordance with
the RTI Act 2005. Strangely enough though, the Demand Draft of Rs. 10 attached
to the application as the fee for asking for information under RTI Act 2005 was
sent back instead of being retained by the NLU Jodhpur authorities. Further
as per the RTI Act, a reply provided by the Public Information Officer should
also include details of the appellate authority and time period for filing
appeal; this was also not complied with. All this
questions the awareness of the NLU-J administration with regard to the rules governing
RTIs as per the RTI Act 2005.
Moreover, the
information asked was not completely provided. According to the application the
information asked included the minutes of all the meetings of the CLAT Core
Committee 2012 that have taken place till date. However, the information sent
in response included only the minutes of the first meeting held in October
2011.
In addition,
another RTI was also filed by me regarding the expenses of the first core
committee meeting. The figures revealed by the information which was sent in
response to this application are as follows:
Travel
|
Room
Rent
|
Food
and Beverages
|
Alcoholic
Beverages
|
Grand Total
|
|
Per Person
|
Rs. 21,808
|
Rs. 5,154
|
Rs. 4,523
|
Nil
|
|
Total Expenses
|
Rs. 3, 48,928
|
Rs. 82,464
|
Rs. 72,368
|
Nil
|
Rs. 5,03,760
|
As such, while
meetings costing Rs. 5 Lacks each have resulted in nothing but fiascos
increasing by the day, may be cutting down in the expenses of the same would
have facilitated scholarships for some students like Donnie whose
entire tuition fee of his 5 year law course at GNLU could have financed from a
part of the aforementioned expenses.
Now all hope for
the establishment of a permanent CLAT body lies in the Delhi High Court petition.
NB:I would like to thank Aditi Choudhary from NUJS, Kolkata for her inputs on this post.
NB:I would like to thank Aditi Choudhary from NUJS, Kolkata for her inputs on this post.
2 comments: (+add yours?)
Brilliant work stripped law team.
Thanks...
office for rent in Bangalore
Post a Comment